1 год тому
April 29: Powell's Last FOMC Statement, Warsh Vote, and a Mag 7 Earnings Cluster
CoinDesk calls April 29 the year's busiest trading day, with three market-moving events packed into a single session. At 10:00 a.m. local time, the Senate Banking Committee is set to vote on Kevin Warsh's nomination as Jerome Powell's successor. At 2:00 p.m., the Federal Open Market Committee releases its policy statement—Powell's last as Fed chair. After the close, Microsoft, Alphabet, Meta and Amazon report first-quarter results.
Positioning going in is distinctly optimistic. CME FedWatch implies near-100% odds the Fed holds rates steady. The Nasdaq ended last week at a record high. About 82% of companies reporting this season have beaten expectations. The risk is that all three pillars lean on the same assumption: the Fed can keep "looking through" $108 oil and leave the rate path intact, allowing big-tech valuations—around 25x forward earnings—to hold. A hawkish tilt from Powell, or a visible crack in any major tech print, could force a rapid repricing.
Powell's final message
Powell's legacy largely hinges on one point: protecting the Fed's policy independence through the most difficult inflation stretch in decades. Any sign in his farewell statement that he is bending to markets or politics would be judged more harshly than a typical policy error. The optics matter even more with the Senate advancing his successor the same day. After his Capitol Hill testimony, Powell said he would "maintain independence" and would not serve as Trump's "megaphone." Those lines will be read alongside the successor process, leaving little room for him to appear soft.
This is the April meeting with no new dot plot and no updated economic projections, concentrating the signal into statement language and the press conference Q&A. With Brent crude near $108, investors will focus on how Powell frames oil-driven inflation risk. The March statement noted that "the impact of the Middle East situation remains uncertain," language that could be strengthened. Markets are less interested in whether cuts are coming soon than in whether Powell labels higher energy prices a "temporary supply shock" or stresses that "upside inflation risks persist." The 2-year Treasury yield is likely to deliver the quickest verdict.
AI spending meets an earnings test
Over the past two years, the "Mag 7" story has been straightforward: spend aggressively on AI infrastructure and ask investors to wait for payoff. This round of results begins to test that narrative in real time. Combined AI-related capital spending by Microsoft, Google, Meta and Amazon has now topped $300 billion. The market's checklist has been consistent—earnings first, cloud growth next, monetization proof last. With results arriving, the key question is how much of that spend is turning into revenue.
Many near-term beats are already expected and largely priced in. What will move the stocks is forward guidance and the tone of commentary on future spending and payback timelines.
Where the earnings call risk concentrates
The four-company cluster does not distribute risk evenly.
Microsoft is likely to take the first and hardest look. Azure growth expectations sit around 38%. Simply meeting that number may not satisfy investors; they want tangible revenue contribution from Copilot for enterprise as the clearest validation of Microsoft's two-year AI thesis. Q2 guidance below 36% would read as negative; above 40% would qualify as a genuine upside surprise.
Alphabet faces a different challenge. Google Cloud is expected to grow 49.6%, the most demanding growth bar among the group, while Gemini's commercialization has not yet produced clear financial disclosure. The market is looking for monetization evidence in dollars, not product demos. A cloud beat without a convincing Gemini revenue signal could land softer than bulls hope.
Amazon must defend momentum at AWS. Last quarter AWS grew 24% and AI services were running at more than $15 billion in annualized revenue. A growth rate slipping below 20% would likely become one of the season's key sentiment inflection points.
Meta appears to carry the most "dangerous" call risk. The room to maneuver on revenue and EPS is limited, leaving the spotlight on its $135 billion annual capex plan. Mark Zuckerberg is effectively required to re-justify that spend each quarter: it is necessary, the return path is visible, and the timeline is credible. Any language implying the company is "continuously evaluating based on market feedback" could be read as wavering. In recent quarters, even slight hesitation on capex wording has triggered weak after-hours reactions.
The one-company miss problem
With four megacaps reporting the same day, investors also face an untested setup: if one name disappoints, does strength from the other three offset it, or does the miss expand into a broader challenge to the AI investment narrative? That divergence risk does not appear fully priced.
A tight timeline, thin hedges
The day's information flow is sequential. At 2:00 p.m., the statement hits first, and the 2-year Treasury will act as the fastest thermometer, with an initial market verdict likely within minutes. At 2:30 p.m., Powell's press conference becomes the densest information window, with markets parsing whether he emphasizes "upside inflation risks" or "transitory supply shocks."
After the close, attention shifts quickly to Microsoft's Azure Q2 guidance and Meta's capex commentary—arguably the most surprise-prone moments of the earnings season.
With the VIX near 18, options protection looks thin. Any negative catalyst could accelerate drawdowns. The highest-risk scenario is a hawkish Powell layered with weak guidance from any one of the Mag 7. If both the Fed and AI narratives wobble at once, the reaction could be sharper than either shock on its own—because it would signal that today's optimism rests on a narrowing foundation.